Universal Builders Supply Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LaweeNCe, Judge:
Certain merchandise, described on the invoice accompanying the entry covered by the above-enumerated protest as “Latticed form supports” and “Solid form supports,” upon importation into the United States at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, and were assessed with duty at the rate of 22y2…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by44 opinions
- Laurence Myers Scaffolding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Altieri v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Altieri v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- American Pecco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.