Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 41334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S.L. Hiatt, the plaintiff-appellant, brought suit in the district court on a promissory note payable to him in the sum of $16,500 March 1, 1924. This note was signed by the defendants-appellees, J.E. and S.M. Hamilton, according to the recitals in the instrument, on November 26, 1921. As a part of the proceedings, the appellant, as plaintiff in the district court, asked the foreclosure of certain collaterals, consisting of notes and mortgages which were given by the appellees, it is alleged, to secure the payment of the foregoing note. A part of this collateral security seems to have been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rule v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Gary v. Northwestern Mutual Aid Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Gould v. GunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Wilson v. ElseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Dickerman v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Carr v. McCauleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Young v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Van Bebber v. BechillOregon Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API