Legal Opinion

Ford v. Euker

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 25, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from decree of chancery court of city of Richmond, rendered June 9, 1888, in the cause of A. J. Ford against Louis Euker, brought for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate for the benefit of the plaintiff’s son, A. J. Ford, Jr. The relief sought was denied and the hill dismissed with costs. Complainant obtained an appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

This suit was instituted by the appellant to compel specific performance by the appellee of a contract dated August 15th, 1884, for the sale of a lot of land.

On the 11th of August Ford offered to buy of the appellee, Euker, sixty feet on Broad street, between Seventh and Eighth streets, running back one hundred and thirty-six and one-half feet, at $200 per front foot, to be paid for by the assumption of a debt secured thereon of $12,000. On the 15th of August Eúker accepted the offer in writing. A few days afterwards, by a writing, not dated, the same contracting parties made another more…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vail v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  2. Bryan v. Lofftus's adm'rsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1842

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rison v. NewberrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
  2. Clay v. LandrethSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Gish's v. JamisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  4. Van Dyke v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Buffalo Coal & Coke Co. v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API