Legal Opinion

Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1950No. 54349; protests 154060-K, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera, which oil differs chemically from true sandalwood oil, and that following the decisions in Nylos Trading Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 1133), affirmed in Same v. Same (37 C. C. P. A. 71, C. A. D. 422), and Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), importations of such oil would now be classified as all other essential and distilled oils, not specially provided for. Applying the principles of the cited decisions to the facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fritzsche Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Nylos Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API