Legal Opinion

Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. WestLB AG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As a preliminary matter, counsel’s conduct in taking on the conflicting representation is governed by the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect at the time of the conduct, rather than by the Rules of Professional Conduct, which were in effect when the motion to disqualify was brought (see Lee v Cintron, 25 Misc 3d 1210[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52023[U], *2 [2009]; see generally Matter of Hays v Ward, 179 AD2d 427, 429 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 754 [1992]).

Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108 (22 NYCRR 1200.27) prohibits an attorney from “representing interests adverse to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Pellegrino v. Oppenheimer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Rose Ocko Foundation, Inc. v. LiebovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Hays v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayers v. Stone Castle Partners, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Justinian Capital SPC v. WestLB AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Sullivan v. CangelosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API