Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Shields

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1977No. Nos. 75-2056, 75-2057 and 75-2167Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partField, Senior Circuit Judge

In drawing heavily upon Wolff and Mor-rissey to reach the conclusion that the minimum requirements of procedural due process apply to parole release proceedings, Judge Butzner’s opinion unquestionably accords with the majority of the courts which have had occasion to consider this question.1 Whether the prescience of these decisions will ultimately prove to be valid is problematical for, as Judge Friendly has noted, “[t]he past observations of the Court have pointed in both directions.”2 However, despite the fact that the Court has not yet spoken definitively on the question, I am not…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Williams v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Childs v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API