C. C. Thompson & Walkup Co. v. Appleby
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick District Court. Hon. C. Reed, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtMilton, J.
The questions of most importance in this case are : Does the evidence which was introduced prove that due and timely notice of the dishonor of the note was given to the indorser, Appleby? Ahd, if it does not, would the evidence which was offered and refused by the trial court have proven that fact?
The essential weakness of the case here presented, when we seek to answer the first question, is manifest. The service of notice was either through notices of protest which were mailed, or through a telephone message sent by Sweet. He states that he telephoned to Appleby’s office. But he neglected…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Seaton v. ScovillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Reed v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Swayze v. BrittonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.