Legal Opinion

State v. Tulley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Van Burén District Court. Seduction. The defendant was indicted under section 4209 of the Revision, and having been convicted, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

1. Evidence: corroboration: seduction. In relation to this offense, the statute provides (Rev., §4103; Code, 1851, §2999) that “the defendant cannot be convicted upon the testimony of the person injured, unless she be corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense.”

This provision was quite fully considered in the case of Andre v. The State, 5 Iowa, 389, and the observations then made in relation to the corroborating evidence contemplated by the statute need not be repeated. And as to meaning of the words in the statute, “ other evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  2. Upton v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KissockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API