Legal Opinion
Werfel v. Zivnostenska Banka
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff has served a complaint stating three causes of action to recover $5,848.15 (170,500 Czechoslovakian crowns) on deposit to the credit of the plaintiff with the defendant, a bank in Prague. A warrant of attachment was issued on the ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation having its place of business in Prague. Moneys belonging to the defendant on deposit with the Chase National Bank were attached by the sheriff of New York county.
*749An outline of the pleadings is as follows: In the first cause of action it is alleged that, during the year 1936, the plaintiff opened an account…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Holzer v. Deutsche Reichsbahn-GesellschaftNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bank of British North America v. Merchants' National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Steinfink v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1941
- In re the Accounting of NeubergerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
- Menendez v. SaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.