Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria Nava
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 2005No. 03-30010Published
1Opinion of the Court
404 F.3d 1119
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Victor Robert NAVA, Sr., aka Big Vic, Defendant, and
Victoria Nava, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30010.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 5, 2004.
Filed April 18, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jack E. Sands, Attorney at Law, Billings, MT, for the appellant.
William W. Mercer and James E. Seykora, U.S. Attorney's Office, Billings, MT, for appellee United States of America.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana;…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.