Legal Opinion

Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 12, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodman, J.

This petition was originally brought to register and confirm title to certain waterfront property in the city of Boston, shown on the accompanying diagram (see 229, infra) as areas A, B, and C, and parcel F. The Commonwealth filed an answer, in effect claiming title to that portion of the property below the Baldwin low water mark of 1846 1 (areas B and C and parcel F). The case was argued on the pleadings, after which the petitioner and the Commonwealth stipulated that the sole question for decision was whether the Commonwealth by certain legislative grants had given the petitioner fee simple…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Haskell v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Home for Aged Women v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boston Waterfront Development Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Opinions of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Arno v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. BD., SELECTMEN OF PROVINCETOWN v. Attorney Gen.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API