Legal Opinion

Metts v. UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 5, 2004No. CV-N-03-0297-LRH(VPC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HICKS, District Judge.

Several motions are presently before the Court. On July 21, 2003, Defendant “University of Nevada Reno” (the “University” or “UNR”) filed a Motion to Dismiss and Quash Attempted Service of Process (Docket No. 11/12). Defendant argues that its motion should be granted pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(j)(2) and 12(b)(1), (2), (5), and (7), as the UNR is not a legal entity capable of being sued. Subsequently, the Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion (Docket No. 14/15) concurrently with a Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 16). In these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n v. L & H Investments, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API