Legal Opinion

Luhrs v. Luhrs

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term. Motion for new trial by the plaintiff upon exceptions, and motion for judgment by the defendant upon verdict directed by the court at circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

There is no contradiction as to the facts developed upon the trial, and they seem to have been as follows: That the plaintiff was the widow of one John Luhrs, and the defendant was his sister; that the Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor, was a benefit and charitable organization organized under the laws of Hew York, doing business in such state, and having property within the state; that, in or about the year 1881, Luhrs became a member of said corporation and of the Allemania lodge, located in the city of Brooklyn, which lodge was a branch of said corporation; that, pursuant to its regulations,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API