Whitfield v. United States

Pro Se; Subpoena Duces Tecum; RCFC 56(d) (when discovery is required to defeat a motion for summary judgment).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge

I. RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

On July 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims that, liberally construed, 1 alleges: (1) a claim for “civil damages for unauthorized collection praetiees[,] pursuant to 2[6] U.S.C. § 7433” (ComplJ 26); and (2) a tax refund claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1), for a $2,927.42 overpayment of tax liabilities for the…