Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Madison

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 5, 2009No. SC 89654Published

1Opinion of the Court

282 S.W.3d 350 (2009)

In re James T. MADISON, Respondent.

No. SC 89654.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

May 5, 2009.

Alan D. Pratzel, Sharon K. Weedin, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for Inf.

James T. Madison, Kansas City, MO, pro se.

2Per curiam

The office of chief disciplinary counsel (OCDC) seeks discipline for James T. Madison for multiple violations of the rules of professional conduct that occurred in the course of handling cases pending before two judges. Mr. Madison is ordered suspended from the practice of law indefinitely without leave to reapply for six months.

I.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API