Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boatmen's National Bank v. Martin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1993No. 73328Published

1Concurrence

CHIEF JUSTICE MILLER,

specially concurring:

Discovery is designed to illuminate the issues and evidence in the case, and in that manner promote a fair settlement or fair adjudication in the matter. (Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co. (1982), 89 Ill. 2d 273, 282.) The value of the discovery process is reduced considerably, however, if counsel is not able to rely on the accuracy and thoroughness of the disclosures made by another party pursuant to appropriate discovery requests. Here, plaintiff’s counsel failed to disclose Dr. Schreiber as a treating physician in response to the defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. EylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ashford v. ZiemannIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Curran Contracting Co. v. Woodland Hills Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API