Legal Opinion

Dugan v. Liggan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.

*1446In August 2006, respondents Daniel Falk, Kevin Evans and Angela Evans (hereinafter collectively referred to as the applicants) filed an application with the Planning Board of the Town of Rosendale for a three-phase subdivision in the Town of Rosendale, Ulster County. The proposed project was to consist of 21 residential lots and one preexisting commercial lot. The Board began a coordinated environmental review in October 2006 and formally announced its intention to act as a lead agency for purposes of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (see ECL art 8 [hereinafter SEQRA]). Respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Best Payphones, Inc. v. Department of Information Technology & TelecommunicationsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Essex County v. ZagataNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ames v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Harvey v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Board of Education v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. North Dock Tin Boat Ass'n v. New York State Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. North Dock Tin Boat Ass'n v. New York State Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API