Legal Opinion

Holmquist v. Farm Family Casualty Insurance

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 15, 2011No. 1:10-cv-530-GZSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 13) filed by De fendant Farm Family Casualty Insurance Company. As explained herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

“Summary judgment’s role in civil litigation is ‘to pierce the pleadings and to assess the proof in order to see whether there is a genuine need for trial.’ ” Young v. Wall, C.A. No. 07-034, 2010 WL 2541053, at *3 (D.R.I. Jan. 28, 2010) (quoting Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc., 895 F.2d 46, 50 (1st Cir.1990)). Generally, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Vincent Dinapoli, Louis Dinapoli, Nicholas Auletta, Edward Halloran, Aniello Migliore, and Alvin O. ChattinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. DowdellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rotman v. Progressive InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. Barraford v. T & N Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Bradley v. CiceroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  4. Humphrey v. LeBlancDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2023
  5. NGM Insurance Company v. SantosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API