Legal Opinion

Natkunanathan v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 9, 2015No. Docket No. 10332-14LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Natkunanathan v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10332-14L

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2015-106; 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 115; 109 T.C.M. (CCH) 1548;

June 9, 2015, Filed

Natkunanathan v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2010-15, 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 17 (T.C., Feb. 1, 2010)

An appropriate order and decision will be entered.

Sivatharan Natkunanathan, Pro se.

Robert H. Berman, for respondent.

LAUBER, Judge.

LAUBER

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAUBER, Judge: In this collection due process (CDP) case petitioner seeks review pursuant to section…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API