Legal Opinion

Robinson v. CHIN & HENSOLT

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2002No. A095725Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARCHIANO, P. J.

This case involves San Francisco’s “pretty cable cars, that climb halfway to the stars.” But after they make that storied climb, they have to return. Several cable car lines use rotating turnarounds to change the direction of the cars. The issue before us is whether the three cable car turnarounds—at the intersections of Powell and Market, Beach and Hyde, and Bay and Taylor—are improvements to realty or personalty. We agree with the trial court that the turnarounds are not personal property but are improvements to real property for purposes of the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sevilla v. Stearns-Roger, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Wagner v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Baker v. Walker & Walker, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. St. Louis, Kansas & Southwestern Railroad v. NyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API