Legal Opinion
In re Barclays Liquidity Cross & High Frequency Trading Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided December 12, 2014No. MDL No. 2589PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair.
Before the Panel:* Defendants Bar-clays PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. (collectively Barclays) move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of New York. The litigation consists of the five actions listed on Schedule A. Four of those actions are already pending in the Southern District of New York, and have been consolidated for all purposes. The fifth action (Great Pacific Securities) is pending in the Central District of California.
The parties’ positions on the Section 1407 motion vary. Lead plaintiffs (a/k/a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Foreign Exchange Transactions LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re JP Morgan Auction Rate Securities (ARS) Marketing LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Barclays Capital Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2015