Harris v. Whittle
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. The writ of habeas corpus is an available remedy for release of one illegally restrained of his liberty. Code, § 50-101. Detention by arrest under a bench warrant based on an indictment regular upon its face (§ 27-801) is not illegal; and consequently the writ of habeas corpus is not available for discharge of one so arrested. § 50-116 (3). See 29 C. J. 45, § 37; Holder v. Beavers, 141 Ga. 217 (2) (80 S. E. 715); Jackson v. Lowry, 170 Ga. 755 (154 S. E. 228). The judge did not err in refusing to discharge the accused on writ of habeas corpus.. 2. It is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holder v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Jackson v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Driver v. SeaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
- Kearse v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Grego v. SHERIFF, CLARK CTY.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978