Commonwealth v. Yant
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Once again we are asked to determine whether the Commonwealth has conformed to the requirements of Pa.R. Crim.P. 1100, which is designed to guarantee criminal defendants a speedy trial by imposing a 180 day limit on the time between the complaint is filed and the accused’s trial is held. Appellant Mark Yant was convicted of burglary and other charges at a trial held on October 17, 1980, and he was given a probationary sentence. He claims that the Commonwealth violated Rule 1100, and that he is entitled to discharge.
The dates relevant to this appeal are as follows:
Jan. 20, 1980 Complaint filed.
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HawkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. Bielski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.