Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yant

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1983No. 2835PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Once again we are asked to determine whether the Commonwealth has conformed to the requirements of Pa.R. Crim.P. 1100, which is designed to guarantee criminal defendants a speedy trial by imposing a 180 day limit on the time between the complaint is filed and the accused’s trial is held. Appellant Mark Yant was convicted of burglary and other charges at a trial held on October 17, 1980, and he was given a probationary sentence. He claims that the Commonwealth violated Rule 1100, and that he is entitled to discharge.

The dates relevant to this appeal are as follows:

Jan. 20, 1980 Complaint filed.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. Bielski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API