Legal Opinion
Young v. Ethyl Corporation
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided September 20, 1974No. ED 72-C-6PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OREN HARRIS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, J. M. Young, brings this diversity action against the defendants, Ethyl Corporation, Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, Calvert Exploration Company, and Bromet Company, seeking an injunction against the defendants from continuing operation of a bromine plant located immediately South of the plaintiff’s land in Columbia County, Arkansas.
In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiff seeks an accounting of the gross proceeds of the defendants’ plant or the gross sales of all products for the purpose of claiming the proportionate part…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Midstates Oil Corp. v. Waller Waller v. Midstates Oil CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Budd v. Ethyl CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. M. Young v. Ethyl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- J. M. Young, Cross-Appellant v. Ethyl Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Young v. Ethyl Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1977