Legal Opinion
Proctor v. King
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided January 10, 2019No. 4:18-cv-04029Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION CECIL WAYNE PROCTOR PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:18-cv-4029 STEVEN KING and CHELSEY FOSTER DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Defendants Steven King and Chelsey Foster’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff Cecil Wayne Proctor has filed a response. (ECF No. 29). Defendants have not filed a reply and their time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 7.2(b). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. I. BACKGROUND This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff pursuant to 42…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Popoalii v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.