Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Carstarphen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from lake County Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

This was an action upon a promissory note by the payee, J. E. Carstarphen, against Spencer, the maker. The defendant pleaded, specially, want of consideration for the note, and a general denial. The trial resulted in a finding and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings this appeal.

On the trial the note being offered in evidence by plaintiff was objected to for the reason that the name “ J. E. Carstarphen” was indorsed on the back of the note. The court permitted the plaintiff to erase the name so indorsed, and thereupon the note was received in evidence. The defendant objected and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parks v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Simons v. WatermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Champion Empire Mining Co. v. BirdColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Champion Empire Mining Co. v. BirdColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API