Williams v. Oeder
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
William W. Young, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants and cross-appellees, Iseral and Una Bishop (“appellants”), appeal from a jury verdict in favor of defendants-appellees and cross-appellants, Barrett Paving Materials, Inc. (“Barrett”), Plainville Concrete Services, Inc. (“Plainville”), and Carl E. Oeder & Sons Sand & Gravel (“Oeder”). The jury found appellees and cross-appellants (“appellees”) not liable for either nuisance or trespass.
Oeder, Barrett, and Plainville operate a sand and gravel processing facility, an asphalt plant, and a concrete plant, respectively. Appellants are two of six…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Eller v. KoehlerOhio Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Adams v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Brown v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- State v. UrbinOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Stephens v. Koch Foods, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.