Porter v. Brooks
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1ConcurrenceSawyer, C. J.
After a careful consideration of the subject, I have arrived at the conclusion, that so shadowy a right as the claim of the vendor of land, to have the unpaid purchase money after default charged upon the land by a Court of equity, is not a lien within the provisions of the Practice Act, which precludes the right to attach. It is not a lien acquired by express contract, but is one of a very imperfect character, at least inchoate, not recognized at all in a Court of law, where attachments are enforced, but fastened upon the land by a Court of equity upon application duly made, even against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baum v. GrigsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Hill v. GrigsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Burdge v. Gold Hill & Bear Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1860