Legal Opinion

Ramco Oil & Gas, Ltd. v. Anglo Dutch (Tenge) L.L.C.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 8, 2005No. 14-04-00433-CVPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellants/cross-appellees Rameo Oil & Gas, Ltd. (“Rameo Oil”) and Rameo Energy PLC (“Rameo Energy”) have filed a motion under Rule 24.4(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure seeking appellate review of what they allege is an excessive amount of security required by the trial court to supersede the judgment from which they appeal in this case. For the reasons stated herein, we require that the amount of bond, deposit, or other security necessary to supersede the trial court’s judgment be decreased as set forth below. To this extent, we grant in part the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Shook v. Walden, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  2. LMC Complete Automotive, Inc. v. Burke, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Texas Custom Pools, Inc. v. Clayton, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  4. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. In Re Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API