Legal Opinion

Village of Woodbury v. Brach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal from the intermediate order dated February 9, 2011, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the intermediate order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In its amended complaint, the plaintiff, the Village of Wood-bury, alleged that on August 11, 2006, the defendant Zigmond *698Brach conveyed a portion of certain real property to the defendant Village of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Sokol v. LeaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Nonnon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dupigny v. St. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Dupigny v. St. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Guthart v. Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API