Legal Opinion

Gandy v. Cornelius

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1919No. 6278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

This suit was instituted to recover on a note for $260 and 10 per cent, attorney’s fees, which note was alleged to be secured by a mortgage lien on three mules, fully described in the petition. The petition refers to an attached mortgage as “Exhibit A,” but it is not in the record. The petition prayed for a judgment on the note and foreclosure of the lien, and’sale of property in satisfaction thereof. It prayed for a writ of sequestration to issue to take possession of the property. It did not allege the value of the property. Its prayer is in the usual form of such petitions, but is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Morgan.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Butts v. LuciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. McMillan v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Cleghon v. BoxleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. GivinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Bishop v. Millers' Indemnity UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Bishop v. Millers' Indem. UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API