State v. Niesen-Pennycuff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} Today we are called upon to interpret R.C. 2951.041(E), a provision of the statute governing intervention in lieu of conviction (“ILC”). Specifically, we are asked to establish the scope of a trial court’s discretion to seal the record of a defendant who has successfully completed the ILC program. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a trial court has discretion to determine that successful completion of the ILC program entitles the defendant to immediate sealing of his or,her record under R.C. 2953.52(A)(1) or to impose the waiting period set forth in R.C. 2953.32(A)(1).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MassienOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. ShoafOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. FortadoOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. V.M.D.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Campbell v. 1 Spring, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. V.M.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Reusch v. ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.