Legal Opinion

Laudman v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. The evidence did not vary or contradict the stipulations of the deed. To show another or additional consideration to that expressed in it was not repugnant to it. (See 6 Cush. 519, 553, 557; 17 Mass. 249,- 257 ; 14 Mo. 482; 39 Mo. 250 ; 3 Hill, 219 ; 26 Iowa, 97, 110 ; 15 Wend. 308, 310-11, 313 ; 33 Wis. 519; 23 Ind. 590; 26 N. Y. 378; 16 Wend. 460 ; 41 N. Y. 316.) The court properly excluded the testimony of the defendant Ingram.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. The evidence did not vary or contradict the stipulations of the deed. To show another or additional consideration to that expressed in it was not repugnant to it. (See 6 Cush. 519, 553, 557; 17 Mass. 249,- 257 ; 14 Mo. 482; 39 Mo. 250 ; 3 Hill, 219 ; 26 Iowa, 97, 110 ; 15 Wend. 308, 310-11, 313 ; 33 Wis. 519; 23 Ind. 590; 26 N. Y. 378; 16 Wend. 460 ; 41 N. Y. 316.) The court properly excluded the testimony of the defendant Ingram. The object and effect of his testimony was to prove anterior stipulations and representations, and those made at the same time as…

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

The plaintiff, Christina Laudman, who is the wife of Jacob Laudman, exchanged lands with the defendant. Each party’s land was valued at the time, which valuation was a part of the consideration or purchase-money to be expressed in the deed. The balance of such consideration was the taxes for the current year, which in each case were to be assessed in the respective names of the- grantees- and paid by them. The deed from the defendant to the plaintiff Christina contained a covenant against encumbrances. The plaintiffs paid the taxes above referred to, which were a lien at the time the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jackson v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. McConnell v. BraynerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Corbett v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Edwards v. LatimerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API