Legal Opinion

Rutland Sav. Bank v. Seeger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1939No. 10688Published

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

The district court of Burleson County adjudged to appellee an undivided half interest in three certain tracts of land in Burleson County, free and clear of a judgment by one of'the District Courts of Dallas County which awarded appellant a foreclosure against the whole interest in such three tracts. Appellee was not a party to the Dallas County suit; her former husband was defendant in the Dallas County suit, and the three tracts of land belonged to the community estate of ap-pellee and W. A. Boyett before their divorce on October 28, 1922. And appellee based her claim to an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amonette v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Russell-Coleman Oil Mill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API