Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Chasnoff
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 15, 2001No. Misc. Docket AG No. 13 Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE F. RODOWSKY, Judge (Retired, Specially Assigned).
The respondent, Joel Chasnoff (Chasnoff), was admitted to the bar of this Court on October 30, 1970. He also has been admitted to the District of Columbia bar. In May 2000 the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a petition for disciplinary action against Chasnoff, charging numerous violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). These included MRPC 1.1 (failure to act with competence); MRPC 1.3 (failure to act with diligence); MRPC 1.4 (failure to communicate with client); MRPC 1.5 (charging an excessive fee); MRPC…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- In Re ChasnoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.