Cornwell v. Hollander
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Hollander, á broker, sued for an agreed commission allegedly earned in connection with the attempted sale of Cornwell’s restaurant business. At the trial the principal witnesses were the parties themselves and the prospective purchasers. The gist of plaintiff’s claim as developed by the testimony was that Cornwell gave him a 90-day exclusive listing agreement to procure a purchaser for his business, that some five weeks later he did procure two purchasers who as partners signed a binding agreement to .buy the business on Cornwell’s terms, but that Cornwell refused to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dotson v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Buckner v. TweedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Dixon v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Dotson v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
- Buckner v. TweedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wetzel v. De GrootDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Pastor v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Leo M. Bernstein & Co. Sales, Inc. v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956