Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. Hollander

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1951No. 1071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Hollander, á broker, sued for an agreed commission allegedly earned in connection with the attempted sale of Cornwell’s restaurant business. At the trial the principal witnesses were the parties themselves and the prospective purchasers. The gist of plaintiff’s claim as developed by the testimony was that Cornwell gave him a 90-day exclusive listing agreement to procure a purchaser for his business, that some five weeks later he did procure two purchasers who as partners signed a binding agreement to .buy the business on Cornwell’s terms, but that Cornwell refused to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dotson v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Buckner v. TweedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Dixon v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Dotson v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906
  5. Buckner v. TweedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. De GrootDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Pastor v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Leo M. Bernstein & Co. Sales, Inc. v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API