Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1903No. 12,871PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Johnson district court; C. A. Smart, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

The material facts necessary to an understanding of this case are these : In 1894, while one Eugene B. McBride was the owner of the southwest quarter of section 36, township 13, range 23, in Johnson county, Kansas, the defendant railroad company instituted proceedings which resulted in the' condemnation of 20.44 acres of said tract of land to be used by it in catching and storing surface water for use .in operating its engines. The award was paid into the county treasury, and accepted and drawn therefrom by the owner. The defendant, company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kansas Central Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Parsons Water Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Arthur D. Jones & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Midland Valley R. Co. v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Neitzel v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API