Legal Opinion

Mabon v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. SC S42044; SC S42070PublishedCited by 1 opinion

(Cases Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

In this original proceeding, two sets of petitioners challenge the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioners are electors who, in a timely manner, submitted written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(1). Accordingly, petitioners are entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2). The arguments that they make here relate to the comments that petitioners made during the administrative process. We modify the ballot title in certain respects and, as modified, certify it to the Secretary of State.

The proposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Oregon Citizen's Alliance v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API