Legal Opinion

Van Voltenburg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1976No. 51966PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

Appellant (Van Voltenburg) and Holloday were indicted, tried before a jury and convicted of two counts — criminal damage to property in excess of $100 and theft by taking less than $100. Appellant was sentenced to five years on the former and twelve months on the latter. He appeals enumerating five errors. Holloday did not appeal. Held:

1. Appellant contends that the evidence submitted by the state to prove the first count, criminal damage to property in excess of $100, was insufficient and that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict of acquittal, upon motion, on that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. StonakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Munsford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Kingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chambley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Polite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Holbrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Waldrop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Paschal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API