Van Voltenburg v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Judge.
Appellant (Van Voltenburg) and Holloday were indicted, tried before a jury and convicted of two counts — criminal damage to property in excess of $100 and theft by taking less than $100. Appellant was sentenced to five years on the former and twelve months on the latter. He appeals enumerating five errors. Holloday did not appeal. Held:
1. Appellant contends that the evidence submitted by the state to prove the first count, criminal damage to property in excess of $100, was insufficient and that the trial court erred in not directing a verdict of acquittal, upon motion, on that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. StonakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Munsford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Kingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chambley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Polite v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Holbrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Waldrop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Paschal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.