Legal Opinion

Workman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1946No. A-10595PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

Defendant, John Workman, was charged in tbe county court of Pittsburg county with tbe unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to-wit; Thirteen pints of assorted whisky. He was tried, convicted and sen tenced to pay a fine of flOO, and to serve 60 days in the county jail, and has appealed.

For a reversal of this case, four assignments of error are presented: (1) Error of the court in overruling the demurrer of defendant to the state’s evidence; (2) error of the court in overruling the motion of defendant to suppress the evidence; (3) error of the court in overruling the motion of defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kennamer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Orrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API