Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schnur

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The testator created four separate trusts, in each of which, after payment of specific sums to others, his widow is beneficiary of one third of the balance of the income and one of his four children is beneficiary of the remaining two thirds. The objeetant, Harry C. Schnur, is one of the four children and is entitled to two thirds of the remaining income of one of the four trusts. There are no objections filed to the accounting of the other three trusts. The objeetant filed two separate objections to the account, but in reality they constitute a single objection to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. In re DoelgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of AdlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Hewitt Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. In Re the Accounting of DoelgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jennings v. SpeakerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  3. Rollins v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. In re the Estate of SiegelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  5. Gowthorpe v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API