Legal Opinion

In re Pierce

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 2, 1929No. 2120PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeahajvi, Presiding Judge

Appellant appeals from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office rejecting his claims for a patent upon an improvement in pipe couplings. Three contentions are made:

First. That claims 13 and 14 were improperly rejected.

Second. That the affidavit of Alfred H. Priebe, offered to support the said claims 13 and 14, was not considered.

Third. That claims 15 and 20 were not admitted and allowed.

The appellant filed his application for a reissue September 4, 1917. On February 17, 1925, Patent No. 1526960 was granted to Brownell, on an application filed January 28, 1924. On June 10,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of PappasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. Application of ReidCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Application of Albert F. PioCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API