Legal Opinion
Chisholm v. Ramia
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 1, 2009No. Civil 3:07cv1691 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. # 22]
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Annemarie Chisholm brings suit under the Fourteenth Amendment against Defendants Shelton Board of Education (“Board”) and Donald Ramia, formerly the headmaster of Shelton High School (“School”), for their decision not to retain her as the head of the Technology and Business Departments at the School (“Department Head”). The Board and Ramia moved for summary judgment, in opposition to which Plaintiff clarified that her suit, although one count, alleges three distinct Fourteenth Amendment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyers v. KishimotoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Moulton v. County of Tioga, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024