Legal Opinion

Chrisman v. Chrisman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1983No. CA 0301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTT, Judge.

These parties were divorced in September, 1976, and appellant Alfred B. Chrisman was condemned to pay permanent alimony to appellee in the amount of $500 per month. In April, 1981, appellant brought a rule to terminate aljmony, and appellee responded with ■ a rule to increase alimony. From a judgment increasing the alimony to $700 this appeal was taken: The basic issue is whether the trial judge abused his discretion considering that appellee works only three days a week and owns and has considerable equity in her home.

There are valid arguments on both sides of the question. On…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Brenan v. MontzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. Super v. SuperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prince v. PrinceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Chrisman v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API