Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fral

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1979No. 1378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*603OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Albert Fral was convicted by a judge sitting without a jury of theft by deception and forgery and on August 20, 1974, was sentenced to two concurrent three-year terms of probation conditioned upon the payment of restitution in the amount of $3,000. After investigation and a report by the probation department a payment schedule of $35 per week was established. Fral objected to neither the terms of the order of restitution nor the court’s power to make such an order.

Subsequently, at a violation-of-probation hearing Fral for the first time asked that the order of restitution…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. FralSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. HartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API