Legal Opinion

United States v. Gee

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 17, 1994No. 93-0282; CMR No. 29075PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the rule enunciated in Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 105-S.Ct. 460, 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984), made applicable to courts-martial in United States v. Sutton, 31 MJ 11 (CMA 1990), encompasses in limine rulings on impeachment that do not involve Mil.R.Evid. 609(a), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984 (impeachment of witness by evidence of conviction of crime). Upon consideration of that question, we hold that the Luce rule is not limited to Mil. R.Evid. 609(a); accordingly, we affirm.1

Pursuant to a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. George William SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Robert M. Weichert, Timberline East, Adirondack Wood Stove Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Tommy Ray Wells and B. C. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. StephensUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  5. United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API