Legal Opinion

Rees v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1955No. 12931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

We reversed the previous judgment in this cause and held that the motion for summary judgment should have been denied, as there was a fact issue involved relating to the existence of a binding and legal contract between the State Board of Control and the guardian, concerning the care of the ward at the Austin State School. As our former opinion states the case, it is unnecessary to here repeat the factual situation giving rise to this lawsuit. See Rees v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 258 S.W.2d 823. The record before us is practically the same as that of the former appeal, except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dupree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Rees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Winchester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. State ex rel. Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. RoarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API