Legal Opinion
Butensky v. Goldberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1933Published
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. There was a question of fact as to the negligence of defendant. (Greenley v. Miller’s, Incorporated, 111 Conn. 584.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. (Wein v. Woolworth Co., 223 App. Div. 794; Woolworth & Co. v. Conboy, 170 Fed. 934; Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co., 205 Mass. 1.)
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Greenley v. Miller's, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Woolworth v. ConboyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Wein v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928