Perez v. Roberts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted the motion of the defendants William Cyriaque and Vogue Cab Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is dismissed, as the appellants are not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144 [2010]; Ratner v Petruso, 274 AD2d 566 [2000]); and it is further,
*621Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The subject…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Volpe v. LimoncelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Franco v. BreceusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Cortes v. WhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Blasso v. ParenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hauser v. AdamovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Trillium USAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- D'Agostino v. YRC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hanakis v. DeCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Markesinis v. JaquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Castle v. BawuahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.