Department of Human Resources v. Coley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentMlKELL, Judge
I agree with the majority that the public duty doctrine does not apply. However, I respectfully dissent because the loss in this tragic case did not result from an “assault” or a “battery” as those terms are used in OCGA § 50-21-24 (7). I would disapprove Dept. of Human Resources v. Hutchinson,26 Christensen v. State of Ga.,27 Sherin v. Dept. of Human Resources,28 and Ga. Military College v. Santamorena29 to the extent that those decisions interpret assault and battery expansively. Instead, the statute should be read narrowly to limit sovereign immunity to losses arising from acts of simple…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Southeastern Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Department of Human Resources v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Dunham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Hendricks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Christensen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.